-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for ppc64le and s390x architectures and distroless builds #746
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Welcome @prb112! |
Hi @prb112. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-scheduler-plugins canceled.
|
We're going to verify the commands (I meant to put as WIP) |
/ok-to-test |
I'd be in favor of this support, but we need to check we have available machines in CI |
Thank you @ffromani |
Signed-off-by: Paul Bastide <pbastide@us.ibm.com>
/assign |
Hey @ffromani and team, @Chandan-Abhyankar and I have completed our testing. I have removed the work in progress label. We look forward to your review and comments and next steps. Thank you, Paul |
@prb112 how urgent you'd like to merge this PR? I'm thinking of support distroless image building so that we have a unified image that works for all archs:
|
Hi @Huang-Wei I'd love to get this sooner than later - our testing starts in 1-2 weeks. We have a custom build. As long as the distroless arrives in a month, it would work with our usecase too. Thanks, Paul |
Usually we cut releases every 3~4 months, so it's possible to get the distroless build code in, and cut a 1.29 release in early July. Does that sound feasible? (BTW: even we proceed with this PR as a temporary solution, we will still have to wait until early July for the new release.) |
Hey @Huang-Wei that sounds a-OK. Is this something we could help complete? Is there a scope of work / containerfiles that would need to be changed? Many thanks, Paul |
@prb112 definitely, fell free to self-assign to work on it.
Other Kubernetes sub-projects have some existing examples. I usually use cs.k8s.io to search - here one example (keyword: gcr.io/distroless/static:nonroot) |
Hi ... apologies, which issue |
I created #756 to track the distroless build work. |
Signed-off-by: Paul Bastide <pbastide@us.ibm.com>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: prb112 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/wip |
Signed-off-by: Paul Bastide <pbastide@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Bastide <pbastide@us.ibm.com>
Hi @Huang-Wei |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Kubernetes supports multiple architectures - amd64 arm arm64 ppc64le s390x. In order to use scheduler plugins on ppc64le or s390x, I'd like to build the scheduler-plugins container image with support for s390x and ppc64le in the sig.
This would be in addition to the already provided x86_64,arm64 container image.
This request is similar to #113
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #745
Special notes for your reviewer:
We are using the scheduler-plugins on multiple-architectures.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?