Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the “Certified Kubernetes” mark on the kubeadm docs page #616

Closed
luxas opened this issue Dec 25, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

Add the “Certified Kubernetes” mark on the kubeadm docs page #616

luxas opened this issue Dec 25, 2017 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation/improvement kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation.
Milestone

Comments

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented Dec 25, 2017

We should make it clear to readers that we're conformant

cc @errordeveloper @stealthybox @fabriziopandini @timothysc

@luxas luxas added this to the v1.10 milestone Dec 25, 2017
@luxas luxas added documentation/improvement kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Dec 25, 2017
@stealthybox
Copy link
Member

Related #617

@stealthybox
Copy link
Member

stealthybox commented Dec 31, 2017

This is a good reference:

Certified Kubernetes Branding Guide

Here's an example with logo on the right.

Which docs should we add the mark to?

website

this repo

I'll start PR's for the ones in bold.
Should we add any others?

@luxas
Copy link
Member Author

luxas commented Jan 1, 2018

I'd be fine with adding the mark to /setup/independent/install-kubeadm as well 👍

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

We need to submit the community distribution details.

@stealthybox
Copy link
Member

stealthybox commented Jan 3, 2018

@timothysc here's the v1.8 conformance PR:
cncf/k8s-conformance#62

Already merged, but results need modifications.

@luxas
Copy link
Member Author

luxas commented Jan 3, 2018

We need to submit the community distribution details.

??
Do you mean that the badge should have some explicit "Community"-mark on it or what?

@stealthybox
Copy link
Member

@luxas, @timothysc said he'd sync up with you on what he means by this.
It has something to do with how the conformance process has been vendor-centric up to this point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation/improvement kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants