Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix typo in retry doc #100406

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021
Merged

fix typo in retry doc #100406

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

tomkukral
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Fixing typo in retry docstring

/kind documentation

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tomkukral. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 19, 2021
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @jpbetz
/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 23, 2021
@jpbetz
Copy link
Contributor

jpbetz commented Mar 23, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 23, 2021
@tomkukral
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tomkukral: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tomkukral
Copy link
Contributor Author

@caesarxuchao @liggitt can you review?

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jul 14, 2021

/ok-to-test
/lgtm
/approve
/priority backlog
/milestone v1.23
/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Jul 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Jul 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, tomkukral

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 14, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit bf22025 into kubernetes:master Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@caesarxuchao caesarxuchao Awaiting requested review from caesarxuchao

@liggitt liggitt Awaiting requested review from liggitt

Assignees

@jpbetz jpbetz

@liggitt liggitt

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.23
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@tomkukral @k8s-ci-robot @fedebongio @jpbetz @liggitt @fejta-bot