Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix error variable name #104006

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021
Merged

fix error variable name #104006

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2021

Conversation

Mzhiing
Copy link
Contributor

@Mzhiing Mzhiing commented Jul 29, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The errors variable name is the same as the standard go errors package name, which may cause unknown errors.
It is recommended to use allErrors instead.

Line 23 imports the errors package, but in line 56, the variable returned by Validate() is also named errors.

This will cause the errors package to not work properly after the variable errors in the function.

Although the errors package can be used before the variable errors, it adds complexity.

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jul 29, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 29, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. label Jul 29, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @Mzhiing!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Mzhiing. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 29, 2021
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @cici37
could you please check if the change is meaninful and review? Thanks!
/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jul 29, 2021
@Mzhiing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mzhiing commented Aug 2, 2021

@cheftako @andrewsykim Please take a look, tks

@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Aug 2, 2021

We have something like ~40 cases of this across the code base. I agree having a variable shadow a package may cause some confusion. I'm not sure should be spending review cycles fixing this as a stand-alone. We should be spending those cycles fixing actual errors. Will lgtm but please do not submit more PRs which are just fixing this type of confusion.

@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Aug 2, 2021

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 2, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheftako, Mzhiing

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 2, 2021
@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Aug 2, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 2, 2021
@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Aug 2, 2021

/priority backlog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 2, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@Mzhiing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mzhiing commented Aug 3, 2021

/retest

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Aug 5, 2021

/ok-to-test

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 06b7de5 into kubernetes:master Aug 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants