Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix build with multiple GOFLAGS #104315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2021
Merged

Conversation

yselkowitz
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

The tag extraction from GOFLAGS doesn't do anything if -tags is not
present in GOFLAGS. Not only does that mean non-sensical tags are
passed, but because GOFLAGS is a space-separated variable, the build
will fail because the build flags because -tags must be comma-separated.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


The tag extraction from GOFLAGS doesn't do anything if -tags is not
present in GOFLAGS.  Not only does that mean non-sensical tags are
passed, but because GOFLAGS is a space-separated variable, the build
will fail because the build flags because -tags must be comma-separated.

Signed-off-by: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@redhat.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 11, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yselkowitz: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 11, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @yselkowitz. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 11, 2021
@ehashman
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test
/priority important-soon
/sig release

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 11, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ehashman ehashman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current behaviour:

# OK
ehashman@red-dot:~$ GOFLAGS='-mod=vendor -p=8 -tags=yay' gotags="selinux,notest,$(echo "${GOFLAGS:-}" | sed -e 's|.*-tags=\([^-]*\).*|\1|')"
ehashman@red-dot:~$ echo $gotags 
selinux,notest,yay

# Bug
ehashman@red-dot:~$ GOFLAGS='-mod=vendor -p=8' gotags="selinux,notest,$(echo "${GOFLAGS:-}" | sed -e 's|.*-tags=\([^-]*\).*|\1|')"
ehashman@red-dot:~$ echo $gotags 
selinux,notest,-mod=vendor -p=8

New behaviour:

ehashman@red-dot:~$ GOFLAGS='-mod=vendor -p=8 -tags=yay' gotags="selinux,notest,$(echo "${GOFLAGS:-}" | sed -ne 's|.*-tags=\([^-]*\).*|\1|p')"
ehashman@red-dot:~$ echo $gotags 
selinux,notest,yay

ehashman@red-dot:~$ GOFLAGS='-mod=vendor -p=8' gotags="selinux,notest,$(echo "${GOFLAGS:-}" | sed -ne 's|.*-tags=\([^-]*\).*|\1|p')"
ehashman@red-dot:~$ echo $gotags 
selinux,notest,

I think this looks correct, we don't want random goflags accidentally included in build tags.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 11, 2021
@ehashman
Copy link
Member

(p command with -n in sed: https://www.grymoire.com/Unix/Sed.html#uh-15b)

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Aug 12, 2021

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sttts, yselkowitz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 12, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9c7426e into kubernetes:master Aug 12, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Aug 12, 2021
@yselkowitz yselkowitz deleted the goflags-fix branch December 10, 2021 04:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants