-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve formatting in CHANGELOGs #105086
Improve formatting in CHANGELOGs #105086
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
Hi @ialidzhikov. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc @pmmalinov01 |
/cc @puerco |
|
||
This vulnerability was reported by Fabricio Voznika and Mark Wolters of Google. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/cc @cici37 Can you take a look at this one ? I am not sure about these new changes. Thanks!
It's OK @Damans227 The formatting issue comes from the original data file we got from the PSC/Security Response Committee. As this data is collected at release time and is never modified again, the changelog would maintain the wrong format unless we update it manually, like this. /ok-to-test |
Got it, thanks @puerco |
Thank you @ialidzhikov ! /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ialidzhikov, puerco The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/sig release
/kind cleanup
Before:
After:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?