Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix AppArmor unloaded profile e2e test #107448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2022

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert commented Jan 10, 2022

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it:

With the removal of the kubelet AppArmor profile validation in #97966 we passed the responsibility of the desired behavior to the container runtime. Therefore we have to change the e2e test which silently broke after the PR merge.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #107342

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

None

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 10, 2022
@saschagrunert saschagrunert added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 10, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jan 10, 2022
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features

With the removal of the kubelet AppArmor profile validation in
kubernetes#97966 we passed the
responsibility of the desired behavior to the container runtime.
Therefore we have to change the e2e test which silently broke after the
PR merge.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features

@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title WIP: Fix AppArmor unloaded profile e2e test Fix AppArmor unloaded profile e2e test Jan 10, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 10, 2022
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

Ready for review, PTAL

@ehashman @SergeyKanzhelev

@adisky
Copy link
Contributor

adisky commented Jan 11, 2022

/triage accepted
/priority important-soon
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 11, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2022
@adisky adisky added this to PRs - Needs Reviewer in SIG Node CI/Test Board Jan 11, 2022
@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/test

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@SergeyKanzhelev: The /test command needs one or more targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
  • /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies
  • /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-big-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-large-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-http-connect
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-no-stage
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu-containerd-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6
  • /test pull-kubernetes-files-remake
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-scale
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-typecheck
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify-govet-levee

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test check-dependency-stats
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-image-test
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cross
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-azure-disk-windows-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-azure-file-windows-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-gpu-windows-dockershim
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-aks-engine-windows-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-disk
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-disk-vmss
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-file
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-file-vmss
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-conformance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-ha-control-plane
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-containerd-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-correctness
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-csi-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-iscsi
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-iscsi-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-grpc
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-slow
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-snapshot
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-autoscaling
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ipvs
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-iptables-azure-dualstack
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ipvs-azure-dualstack
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-dual-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipvs-dual-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-multizone
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-network-policies
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-windows-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big
  • /test pull-kubernetes-local-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-alpha
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-alpha-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-podutil
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-eviction
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-eviction-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-cpu-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-cpu-manager-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-crio-cgroupv1
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-crio-cgroupv2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-hugepages
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-memory-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-topology-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-topology-manager-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-memoryqos-cgrpv2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-fedora
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-ubuntu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit-experimental
  • /test pull-publishing-bot-validate

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
  • pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel
  • pull-kubernetes-dependencies
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-ubuntu-containerd
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6
  • pull-kubernetes-integration
  • pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd
  • pull-kubernetes-typecheck
  • pull-kubernetes-unit
  • pull-kubernetes-verify
  • pull-kubernetes-verify-govet-levee

In response to this:

/test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-ubuntu

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

this job ^^^ should run the affected test

Copy link
Member

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

this: /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features has actually run the affected test sucessfully

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert, SergeyKanzhelev

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 11, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 11, 2022

@saschagrunert: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-node-swap-ubuntu fcca81a link false /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-ubuntu

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/skip

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-unit

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f8bb35d into kubernetes:master Jan 11, 2022
SIG Node CI/Test Board automation moved this from PRs - Needs Reviewer to Done Jan 11, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.24 milestone Jan 11, 2022
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the apparmor-e2e branch January 12, 2022 07:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/failing-test Categorizes issue or PR as related to a consistently or frequently failing test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Archived in project
4 participants