-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
e2e: use user provided timeout in WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady #111907
Conversation
The WaitFor* refactoring in 07c34eb had an oversight what timeout parameter is used for calling WaitForAllPodsCondition() in WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady() so the calls to WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady() ended up ignoring the user provided timeout. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@intel.com>
Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Thu Aug 18 07:40:11 UTC 2022. |
@mythi: This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Hi @mythi. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc @tallclair |
/ok-to-test |
FWIW, I'd want this merged to get it to the release because I'm using the e2e framework outside of k/k and this regresses our tests when we moved to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
@kubernetes/release-managers: this is a trivial bug fix with a low risk for regressions. Can this go into 1.25.0? |
/cc @kubernetes/milestone-maintainers |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mythi, pohly, stevekuznetsov The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
The
WaitFor*
refactoring in 07c34eb had an oversight what timeout parameteris used for calling
WaitForAllPodsCondition()
inWaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady()
so the calls to
WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady()
ended up ignoring the userprovided timeout. Fix that.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: