Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

e2e: use user provided timeout in WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady #111907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2022

Conversation

mythi
Copy link
Contributor

@mythi mythi commented Aug 18, 2022

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

The WaitFor* refactoring in 07c34eb had an oversight what timeout parameter
is used for calling WaitForAllPodsCondition() in WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady()
so the calls to WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady() ended up ignoring the user
provided timeout. Fix that.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

The WaitFor* refactoring in 07c34eb had an oversight what timeout parameter
is used for calling WaitForAllPodsCondition() in WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady()
so the calls to WaitForPodsWithLabelRunningReady() ended up ignoring the user
provided timeout. Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@intel.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Aug 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the release-1.25 branch. This means every merged PR will be automatically fast-forwarded via the periodic ci-fast-forward job to the release branch of the upcoming v1.25.0 release.

Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Thu Aug 18 07:40:11 UTC 2022.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mythi: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mythi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework label Aug 18, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 18, 2022
@mythi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mythi commented Aug 18, 2022

/cc @tallclair

@bart0sh
Copy link
Contributor

bart0sh commented Aug 18, 2022

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 18, 2022
@mythi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mythi commented Aug 19, 2022

Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the release-1.25 branch. This means every merged PR will be automatically fast-forwarded via the periodic ci-fast-forward job to the release branch of the upcoming v1.25.0 release.
'

FWIW, I'd want this merged to get it to the release because I'm using the e2e framework outside of k/k and this regresses our tests when we moved to v1.25-rc.0.

Copy link
Contributor

@pohly pohly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 22, 2022
@pohly
Copy link
Contributor

pohly commented Aug 22, 2022

@kubernetes/release-managers: this is a trivial bug fix with a low risk for regressions. Can this go into 1.25.0?

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor

pohly commented Aug 22, 2022

/cc @kubernetes/milestone-maintainers

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mythi, pohly, stevekuznetsov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 95dab53 into kubernetes:master Aug 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.26 milestone Aug 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants