New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
managedfields: Move most of fieldmanager package to managefields #115065
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:master
from
apelisse:apimachinery-managed-fields
Mar 10, 2023
Merged
managedfields: Move most of fieldmanager package to managefields #115065
k8s-ci-robot
merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:master
from
apelisse:apimachinery-managed-fields
Mar 10, 2023
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
release-note-none
Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
kind/cleanup
Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt.
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
do-not-merge/needs-sig
Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one.
needs-triage
Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
needs-priority
Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one.
labels
Jan 13, 2023
/triage accepted |
k8s-ci-robot
added
triage/accepted
Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
priority/important-soon
Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
area/apiserver
and removed
needs-triage
Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
needs-priority
Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one.
labels
Jan 13, 2023
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/api-machinery
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.
and removed
do-not-merge/needs-sig
Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one.
labels
Jan 13, 2023
apelisse
force-pushed
the
apimachinery-managed-fields
branch
from
January 13, 2023 21:20
f285e84
to
5728c4b
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/auth
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth.
needs-rebase
Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
labels
Jan 13, 2023
apelisse
force-pushed
the
apimachinery-managed-fields
branch
from
January 18, 2023 22:09
5728c4b
to
4c2936a
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
area/test
sig/testing
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing.
labels
Jan 18, 2023
apelisse
force-pushed
the
apimachinery-managed-fields
branch
from
January 18, 2023 23:09
4c2936a
to
d74e49b
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
needs-rebase
Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
label
Jan 18, 2023
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
label
Jan 19, 2023
apelisse
force-pushed
the
apimachinery-managed-fields
branch
from
January 19, 2023 23:55
d74e49b
to
faf469d
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/XXL
Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
and removed
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
labels
Jan 19, 2023
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
soltysh
pushed a commit
to soltysh/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
soltysh
pushed a commit
to soltysh/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
bertinatto
added a commit
to bertinatto/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
soltysh
pushed a commit
to soltysh/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
soltysh
pushed a commit
to soltysh/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
soltysh
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
dinhxuanvu
pushed a commit
to dinhxuanvu/kubernetes
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2024
…util/managedfields Some of the code we use in openshift-tests was recently made internal in kubernetes#115065. This patch exposes the code we need there.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
area/apiserver
area/test
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
kind/cleanup
Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt.
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
priority/important-soon
Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
release-note-none
Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note.
sig/api-machinery
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.
sig/auth
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth.
sig/testing
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing.
size/XXL
Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
triage/accepted
Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Move most of the fieldmanager package from
k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/endpoints/handler/fieldmanager
tok8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/managedfields
where it'll be much easier to import in various parts of the system, including client-go which will be able to use it for test.This only moves code, and all references to the code. There is no behavior change. Except for the move, the gvkParser has been copied temporarily into the internal package to avoid the dependency cycle, but will have to be removed soon when the gvkParser is deprecated anyway (see #114439 which will contribute to that).
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?