Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve performance of method PodRequests #116507

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

sourcelliu
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup
/sig api-machinery

What this PR does / why we need it:

Improve the performance of the map containerStatuses.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


Signed-off-by: mantuliu <240951888@qq.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sourcelliu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 12, 2023
@cici37
Copy link
Contributor

cici37 commented Mar 21, 2023

/sig node
/remove-sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. labels Mar 21, 2023
@bart0sh
Copy link
Contributor

bart0sh commented Mar 31, 2023

/triage accepted
/priority backlog
/assign
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 31, 2023
@bart0sh bart0sh moved this from Triage to Needs Reviewer in SIG Node PR Triage Mar 31, 2023
@bart0sh
Copy link
Contributor

bart0sh commented Apr 1, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: ec80e5968046b0828b63492dabe49d8c8685cb18

@bart0sh bart0sh moved this from Needs Reviewer to Needs Approver in SIG Node PR Triage Apr 1, 2023
@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Oct 26, 2023

@dims ptal

@mrunalp mrunalp moved this from Needs Approver to Needs Reviewer in SIG Node PR Triage Oct 26, 2023
@mrunalp mrunalp moved this from Needs Reviewer to Needs Approver in SIG Node PR Triage Oct 26, 2023
@mrunalp mrunalp moved this from Needs Approver to Done in SIG Node PR Triage Oct 26, 2023
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Oct 26, 2023

/approve

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Oct 26, 2023

/assign @liggitt

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Oct 26, 2023

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, liggitt, mrunalp, sourcelliu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 26, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c73ab51 into kubernetes:master Oct 26, 2023
11 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.29 milestone Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants