New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use build-in max and min func to instead of k8s.io/utils/integer funcs #122310
use build-in max and min func to instead of k8s.io/utils/integer funcs #122310
Conversation
/retest |
/assign @jiahuif |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally looks reasonable to me. However, please address comments by @HirazawaUi
/unassign
/assign @HirazawaUi
Re-assigning to existing reviewer. Thank you.
18f1023
to
eb8f3f1
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 7574320a68a0d41ca451777aced5c5c2758cac1f
|
/lgtm |
/priority backlog |
@alculquicondor, @deads2k, @mrunalp PTAL, need approve :) |
/approve |
1 similar comment
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, liggitt, weilaaa The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
These methods of "k8s.io/utils/integer" are no longer needed as the addition of the built-in max and min methods. So replace them of build-in min and max methods.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
cc @liggitt