fix e2e test test should assign default SC to PVCs that have no SC set failure

[yangjunmyfm192085]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

When the cluster exists storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class: "true" When annotating the storage class, the e2e test case test should assign default SC to PVCs that have no SC set reports an error.

   Jan 31 14:06:57.427: INFO: Success - PersistentVolumeClaim retro-pvc-krf4d got updated retroactively with StorageClass retroqr5w4
   Jan 31 14:06:57.442: INFO: Unexpected error:
       <*errors.StatusError | 0xc0006fc8c0>:
       Operation cannot be fulfilled on storageclasses.storage.k8s.io "provisioning-nfs": the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest version and try again
       {
           ErrStatus:
               code: 409
               details:
                 group: storage.k8s.io
                 kind: storageclasses
                 name: provisioning-nfs
               message: 'Operation cannot be fulfilled on storageclasses.storage.k8s.io "provisioning-nfs":
                 the object has been modified; please apply your changes to the latest version and
                 try again'
               metadata: {}
               reason: Conflict
               status: Failure,
       }
   [FAILED] in [It] - test/e2e/storage/pvc_storageclass.go:152 @ 01/31/24 14:06:57.442

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

"NONE"

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

[k8s-ci-robot]

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[yangjunmyfm192085]

/cc @pohly

[mattcary]

/lgtm

thank you!

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 05fb8ba27d884c441977be95a48d41313230c7e1

[yangjunmyfm192085]

/retest

[yangjunmyfm192085]

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind

[pohly]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pohly, yangjunmyfm192085

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/e2e/storage/OWNERS [pohly]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment