-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
e2e_node: use kubelet_exec_t instead of bin_t for kubelet #123726
Conversation
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 19c1d56a54b09254185e661f1cede8786bda7b16
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dchen1107, haircommander The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test |
@harche: The
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e |
/test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e |
as bin_t isn't powerful enough, and we run into a wack-a-mole situation making bin_t powerful enough for the tests Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
/test |
@kannon92: The
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test pull-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 2e1b68d808dd030fd8723732b523bfe42fa8ce63
|
/retitle e2e_node: use kubelet_exec_t instead of bin_t for kubelet |
as bin_t isn't powerful enough, and we run into a wack-a-mole situation making bin_t powerful enough for the tests
What type of PR is this?
/kind failing-test
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #123715
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: