-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decide semantics of predicate precomputations. #35168
Comments
As of now, i think we leaned towards
|
Re 1) - yes, I believe this is what we are doing for all predicates now. |
Issues go stale after 30d of inactivity. Prevent issues from auto-closing with an If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Problem
Some predicates may need precomputations or "preconditions" to be met before they can run.
predicateMetadata
struct.Solution
We should decide wether (1) predicates should try to create data which is precomputed and (2) if so, what the best way to do this is which is scalable and doesnt lead to duplication of error handling/querying.
Two possible solutions:
@wojtek-t Suggesting this as a follow on to #33763 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: