-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite} #36547
Comments
Failed: [k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite}
|
Failed: [k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite}
|
https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/kubernetes-kubemark-gce-scale/1554/ Failed: [k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite}
|
https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/kubernetes-kubemark-gce-scale/1559/ Failed: [k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite}
|
kubemark scale failures should be ignored, as we're currently running a lot of experiments using this suite. |
https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-kubemark-gce-scale/3/ Failed: [k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite}
|
Actually all of those are kubemark-scale or gce-enormous. These were expected failures. We (temporarily) removed kubemark-scale for generating issue reports, so it shouldn't happen in the future (until we make it stable enough to move it back). |
https://k8s-gubernator.appspot.com/build/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/kubernetes-e2e-gce-enormous-cluster/159/
Failed: [k8s.io] Load capacity [Feature:Performance] should be able to handle 30 pods per node {Kubernetes e2e suite}
Previous issues for this test: #26544 #26938 #27595 #30146 #30469 #31374 #31427 #31433 #31589 #31981 #32257 #33711 #33839
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: