Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

volumes: promote some logs from info -> warning #42252

Merged

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

Part of #40583

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 28, 2017
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Feb 28, 2017
@justinsb justinsb modified the milestone: v1.6 Feb 28, 2017
@calebamiles
Copy link
Contributor

@ethernetdan, this is probably fine to merge despite slush. not strictly a bug but improved log level handling.

cc: @kubernetes/kubernetes-release-managers

@justinsb justinsb modified the milestones: v1.6, v1.7 Mar 2, 2017
@k8s-reviewable
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@jingxu97
Copy link
Contributor

jingxu97 commented Mar 7, 2017

/approve

@jingxu97
Copy link
Contributor

jingxu97 commented Mar 7, 2017

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2017
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

@k8s-bot bazel test this
@k8s-bot non-cri e2e test this
@k8s-bot gci gce e2e test this

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

@saad-ali can you approve please?

/assign @saad-ali

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 18, 2017
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels May 24, 2017
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

justinsb commented Jun 1, 2017

Simple rebase; readding LGTM

@justinsb justinsb added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 1, 2017
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

justinsb commented Jun 1, 2017

@k8s-bot non-cri e2e test this
@k8s-bot gci gce e2e test this
@k8s-bot unit test this
@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-federation-e2e-gce test this

@marun marun added the sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. label Jun 8, 2017
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

@k8s-bot pull-kubernetes-unit test this

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

ping @saad-ali

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jun 16, 2017

/remove-priority P3
/priority awaiting-more-evidence
I'm not actually sure this is the right priority, just trying to remove the old priority/PN labels

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. and removed priority/P3 labels Jun 16, 2017
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Jun 21, 2017

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-etcd3

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Jun 21, 2017

/lgtm

1 similar comment
@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dchen1107, jingxu97, justinsb, msau42

Associated issue: 40583

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 22, 2017
@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@k8s-bot test this [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42252, 42251, 42249, 47512, 47887)

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit bebe346 into kubernetes:master Jun 22, 2017
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@justinsb: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
Jenkins non-CRI GCE e2e 01bf615 link @k8s-bot non-cri e2e test this
Jenkins GCI GCE e2e 01bf615 link @k8s-bot gci gce e2e test this
Jenkins unit/integration 01bf615 link @k8s-bot unit test this
pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-etcd3 35be997 link /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-etcd3

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet