Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFE: Explore in-process v3 etcd server #43088

Closed
timothysc opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

RFE: Explore in-process v3 etcd server #43088

timothysc opened this issue Mar 14, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.

Comments

@timothysc
Copy link
Member

Recent changes to etcd3 have made it easier to embed the etcd server into the executable: https://github.com/coreos/etcd/pull/7496/files

Before that, there was little motivation other then deployment and distribution. This would allow for an easier deployment model and increased performance for in-process embedding(sans-transport), which may even lead to cache-reduction or elimination.

The tradeoff here is the apiserver will need to be deployed in 1,3,5.

As we talk about kubeadm-HA deployments we may want to consider this approach.

/cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-feature-requests

@timothysc timothysc added sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. labels Mar 14, 2017
@timothysc timothysc added this to the v1.7 milestone Mar 14, 2017
@xiang90
Copy link
Contributor

xiang90 commented Mar 14, 2017

/cc @justinsb

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

Removing milestone - this isn't critical and noone really has capacity for it.

@wojtek-t wojtek-t removed this from the v1.7 milestone May 30, 2017
@wojtek-t wojtek-t added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. triaged labels May 30, 2017
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 25, 2017
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 24, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants