Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cluster IP update is not carried to federation-controller #43455

Closed
henriquetruta opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Cluster IP update is not carried to federation-controller #43455

henriquetruta opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/federation kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Multicluster.

Comments

@henriquetruta
Copy link
Contributor

Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST? (choose one):
Bug report

Kubernetes version (use kubectl version):
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"5", GitVersion:"v1.5.2", GitCommit:"08e099554f3c31f6e6f07b448ab3ed78d0520507", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2017-01-12T04:57:25Z", GoVersion:"go1.7.4", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"5", GitVersion:"v1.5.3", GitCommit:"029c3a408176b55c30846f0faedf56aae5992e9b", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2017-02-15T06:34:56Z", GoVersion:"go1.7.4", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}

Environment:

  • Cloud provider or hardware configuration: GCE (federation control plane) + Cluser on-prem

What happened:
I had a federation running, with the control plane at GCE and a local on-prem cluster, running in a VM. Then, I had to change the port my local api-server was running. I've updated the cluster file and ran kubetl --context=federation apply -f cluster.yaml. The object was properly updated but the federation-controller-manager started to fail, because it was still trying to reach in the old port.

What you expected to happen:
federation-controller-manager to be refreshed at some point, updating the cluster port. I had to delete and recreate the local cluster

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):
Create a federation on GCE, join another cluster and change some cluster information. In my case I needed to change the port, so I updated the cluster object.

Anything else we need to know:
How I made my federation setup: https://github.com/henriquetruta/hybrid-k8s-federation/

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label May 31, 2017
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jun 17, 2017

/sig federation

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Jun 17, 2017
@ghost ghost added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. labels Sep 7, 2017
@csbell csbell added area/federation sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Multicluster. and removed sig/federation labels Oct 10, 2017
@irfanurrehman
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was labelled only for sig/multicluster and is thus moved over to kubernetes-retired/federation#121.
If this does not seem to be right, please reopen this and notify us @kubernetes/sig-multicluster-misc.
/close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/federation kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/multicluster Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Multicluster.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants