-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add shyamjvs to test/OWNERS #55319
Add shyamjvs to test/OWNERS #55319
Conversation
@shyamjvs: Adding do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed because the release note process has not been followed. One of the following labels is required "release-note", "release-note-action-required", or "release-note-none". Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@shyamjvs: Adding do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed because the release note process has not been followed. One of the following labels is required "release-note", "release-note-action-required", or "release-note-none". Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
+1 on that, but I'd like to get a second approval from someone from @kubernetes/sig-testing-misc. @spiffxp? |
/lgtm |
What do you think about OWNERS files in the specific directories you mentioned rather than at the top level of test? |
eg:
|
They don't have individual owners files. For e.g |
/retest |
lgtm, 😂 obviously our test-infra folks cannot approve for you here |
/approve no-issue |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fejta, shyamjvs, spiffxp Associated issue requirement bypassed by: spiffxp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:
You can indicate your approval by writing |
Yup.. I agree :) |
Aaron 100% agree with that instinct. Filed a bug to do this separately. |
/retest |
@fejta Any reason why you've removed the |
Yes, please leave retest labels off PRs as it just slows down the overall merge rate as it invalidates batch merges. |
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55301, 55319, 54018, 55322, 55125). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here. |
I've been reviewing quite some PRs recently and have reviewed many in the past. + I have >80 commits in this code path (git log test | grep "shyamjvs@google.com") touching various parts including e2e/framework, utils, perftype, kubemark, e2e fixes from other SIGs (mostly in regard of scalability).
/cc @gmarek @spiffxp @krzyzacy @kubernetes/sig-testing-misc