Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tag multi-az cluster volume e2e test with sig-storage #58841

Merged

Conversation

marun
Copy link
Contributor

@marun marun commented Jan 26, 2018

Follow-on from #58726 to make it clear that responsibility for the test is shared between @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews and @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews.

NONE

cc: @bsalamat @timothysc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 26, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. sig/architecture Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture. labels Jan 26, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@marun: Those labels are not set on the issue: sig/architecture

In response to this:

/remove-sig architecture
/sig scheduling

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Jan 26, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@marun: Those labels are not set on the issue: sig/architecture

In response to this:

/remove-sig architecture
/sig scheduling

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bsalamat
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
cc: @timothysc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 26, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bsalamat, marun

Associated issue: #58726

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58713, 58841). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants