Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

E2E tests for DynamicProvisioningScheduling support for GCE PD and RePD #67963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2018
Merged

E2E tests for DynamicProvisioningScheduling support for GCE PD and RePD #67963

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2018

Conversation

ddebroy
Copy link
Member

@ddebroy ddebroy commented Aug 28, 2018

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add end2end tests to exercise DynamicProvisioningScheduling features for GCE PD and RePD. The tests make sure WaitForFirstConsumer and AllowedTopologies specified in a GCE PD/RePD storage class has the desired effect.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:
Tests features added in a2de7d2

Release note:

NONE

/sig storage
cc @msau42

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 28, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. label Aug 28, 2018
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Aug 28, 2018

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 28, 2018
Copy link
Member

@msau42 msau42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This lgtm! Just a minor comment

if !zoneFound {
framework.Failf("zones specified in AllowedTopologies: %v does not contain zone of node where PV got provisioned: %s", topoZones, nodeZone)
}
checkZoneFromLabelAndAffinity(pv, nodeZone, false)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this check that both zones were specified?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed. Thanks for catching this. I have tightened the check.

@ddebroy
Copy link
Member Author

ddebroy commented Aug 28, 2018

/assign @rootfs

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Aug 28, 2018

lgtm, please squash

Signed-off-by: Deep Debroy <ddebroy@docker.com>
@ddebroy
Copy link
Member Author

ddebroy commented Aug 28, 2018

squashed commits so far

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Aug 28, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ddebroy, msau42

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 28, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

@ddebroy
Copy link
Member Author

ddebroy commented Aug 29, 2018

/milestone v1.12

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ddebroy: You must be a member of the kubernetes/kubernetes-milestone-maintainers github team to set the milestone.

In response to this:

/milestone v1.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel comment for consistent failures.

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Aug 29, 2018

/retest

@ddebroy
Copy link
Member Author

ddebroy commented Aug 29, 2018

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@ddebroy
Copy link
Member Author

ddebroy commented Aug 29, 2018

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

/test all [submit-queue is verifying that this PR is safe to merge]

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot merged commit 34d75d7 into kubernetes:master Aug 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants