Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #68691: verify invalid secret/configmap/projected volumes #68766

Conversation

gnufied
Copy link
Member

@gnufied gnufied commented Sep 18, 2018

Cherry pick of #68691 on release-1.10.

#68691: verify invalid secret/configmap/projected volumes

And avoid calling Setup if they don't exist
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gnufied: This PR is not for the master branch but does not have the cherry-pick-approved label. Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To approve the cherry-pick, please assign the patch release manager for the release branch by writing /assign @username in a comment when ready.

The list of patch release managers for each release can be found here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 18, 2018
@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented Sep 18, 2018

/sig storage

cc @saad-ali @childsb

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Sep 18, 2018
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/kind bug

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Sep 19, 2018
@MaciekPytel MaciekPytel added cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. labels Sep 21, 2018
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Oct 16, 2018

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 475542a into kubernetes:release-1.10 Oct 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants