Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Aligned sched_perf owner. #69616

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2018
Merged

Conversation

k82cn
Copy link
Member

@k82cn k82cn commented Oct 10, 2018

Also used OWNER_ALIAS in scheduler_perf OWNER

Release note:

None

Signed-off-by: Da K. Ma <klaus1982.cn@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 10, 2018
@wgliang
Copy link
Contributor

wgliang commented Oct 10, 2018

/retest

@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2018
@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

ravisantoshgudimetla commented Oct 10, 2018

/assign @bsalamat

for approval

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ravisantoshgudimetla: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: for, approval.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can be assigned.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign @bsalamat for approval

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@bsalamat bsalamat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bsalamat, k82cn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 10, 2018
@k82cn
Copy link
Member Author

k82cn commented Oct 11, 2018

/sig scheduling
/kind cleanup

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 11, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a9fb3f5 into kubernetes:master Oct 11, 2018
@k82cn k82cn deleted the sched_perf_owner branch May 16, 2022 06:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants