Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove duplicate root check for kubeadm #69927

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2018

Conversation

SataQiu
Copy link
Member

@SataQiu SataQiu commented Oct 17, 2018

What this PR does / why we need it:
The addCommonChecks function is only used by RunJoinNodeChecks and RunInitMasterChecks function. And both of the two functions do RootCheck at the beginning. So I think it maybe redundant to add RootCheck into the addCommonChecks function.

/kind cleanup

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 17, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. area/kubeadm sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 17, 2018
@SataQiu
Copy link
Member Author

SataQiu commented Oct 17, 2018

/assign @luxas

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/cc
/cc @fabriziopandini

@neolit123
Copy link
Member

thanks for the fix @SataQiu
LGTM
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 17, 2018
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SataQiu Thanks for fixing this!
/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 19, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini, SataQiu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 19, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b7c2d92 into kubernetes:master Oct 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubeadm cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants