-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lighter weight make for conformance dependencies, better script and manifest #74608
Lighter weight make for conformance dependencies, better script and manifest #74608
Conversation
Change-Id: I78cff10231eabd53b1fc7bdd1526c861179e135a
Change-Id: I137180ed781edd4a9877cabe039e40a72aa71366
/assign @timothysc @ixdy |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
spec: | ||
containers: | ||
- name: conformance-container | ||
image: staging-k8s.gcr.io/conformance-amd64:v1.14-alpha4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we want to hardcode this version in here?
also why staging-k8s?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will fix. these are from the code that already exists, will have to change that
09424f3
to
35476ac
Compare
Change-Id: I1eb673fe37b5e8a719f9095473765c80fb7f2347
35476ac
to
87d9903
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
1 similar comment
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
Change-Id: Ib0d6f681be3537f0cbfcae1dc254f1c42a04be66
/priority important-soon |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally lgtm , but I'm conflicted on the landing zone for some of this vs. under build as a set of image artifacts.
/lgtm
/hold
/cc @stevesloka @ixdy
@timothysc: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: stevesloka. Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold cancel |
|
||
REGISTRY?=staging-k8s.gcr.io | ||
REGISTRY?=k8s.gcr.io |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this should have remained staging - you can't push to k8s.gcr.io directly, only to staging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aha. will fix in a next rev
FYI @dims @ixdy Error message:
|
@mtaufen let me try that |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Makefile
to make it easier for folks to build/run dependencies and imagekind
cluster)Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Related to #69777
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: