Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: use framework.ExpectNoError instead in e2e tests #77159

Merged

Conversation

draveness
Copy link
Contributor

@draveness draveness commented Apr 27, 2019

/kind cleanup
/priority backlog

What this PR does / why we need it:

Related to #77103

Replace with framework.ExpectNoError in those files:

test/e2e/apimachinery
test/e2e/network
test/e2e/node
test/e2e/instrumentation
test/e2e/kubectl
test/e2e/scalability
test/e2e/scheduling
test/e2e/servicecatalog
test/e2e/ui
test/e2e/upgrades/apps
test/e2e/upgrades
test/e2e/upgrades/storage
test/e2e/windows

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

/cc @oomichi

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 27, 2019
@draveness draveness force-pushed the feature/refactor-expect-no-errors branch from d8c0a33 to 12bbce7 Compare April 27, 2019 07:38
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 27, 2019
@draveness
Copy link
Contributor Author

draveness commented Apr 27, 2019

/assign @saad-ali

@draveness draveness force-pushed the feature/refactor-expect-no-errors branch from 12bbce7 to 04bb797 Compare April 27, 2019 07:49
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented May 1, 2019

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: draveness, liggitt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8f5a62a into kubernetes:master May 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants