Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix golint failures of e2e/framework/*.go #77643

Merged

Conversation

atoato88
Copy link
Contributor

@atoato88 atoato88 commented May 9, 2019

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

This fixes golint failures of the following files:

  • test/e2e/framework/networking_utils.go
  • test/e2e/framework/service_util.go
  • test/e2e/framework/util.go

All golint failures in test/e2e/framework are fixed at this commit.
Remove 'test/e2e/framework' from 'hack/.golint_failures'.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Ref: #68026

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels May 9, 2019
Copy link
Member

@spiffxp spiffxp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address review comments

test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@atoato88 atoato88 force-pushed the fix-golint-e2e-framework-asterisk branch from bc6eed2 to cd58b35 Compare May 9, 2019 21:28
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/framework/service_util.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@atoato88 atoato88 force-pushed the fix-golint-e2e-framework-asterisk branch from cd58b35 to 726dbdd Compare May 9, 2019 23:30
@atoato88
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-verify

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 10, 2019

@atoato88 I've confirmed @spiffxp points and my points on the latest PR, thanks for updating.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 10, 2019
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented May 10, 2019

/priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels May 10, 2019
@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 10, 2019

/approve

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 10, 2019

@spiffxp Is it still necessary to be marked as "requested changes "?

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented May 11, 2019

One typo remaining otherwise looks good. I guess I can get onboard with not renaming the methods if we're just trying to be mechanical about this.

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 11, 2019

/lgtm cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 11, 2019
This fixes golint failures of the following files:
- test/e2e/framework/networking_utils.go
- test/e2e/framework/service_util.go
- test/e2e/framework/util.go

All golint failures in test/e2e/framework are fixed at this commit.
Remove 'test/e2e/framework' from 'hack/.golint_failures'
@atoato88 atoato88 force-pushed the fix-golint-e2e-framework-asterisk branch from 726dbdd to dddc6a5 Compare May 13, 2019 22:08
@atoato88
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu

Copy link
Member

@spiffxp spiffxp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2019
@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 13, 2019

/approve

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 14, 2019

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented May 14, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: atoato88, oomichi, spiffxp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 14, 2019
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented May 15, 2019

/kind cleanup

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 15, 2019

/kind cleanup cancel

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 15, 2019

/kind cleanup

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 15, 2019

/kind bug

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels May 15, 2019
@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 15, 2019

/kind bug cancel

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented May 16, 2019

/remove-kind bug

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label May 16, 2019
@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented May 16, 2019

@nikhita Thanks for doing that, that was what I wanted to do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-test-framework Issues or PRs related to refactoring the kubernetes e2e test framework area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants