Sort kubeadm CLI default params for component config API objects

[dims]

See problem reported here : #70131 (comment) We need to keep the list sorted.

Change-Id: If4ba57d528f925de9d536b18c0e6d71fc6d63659

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[dims]

/priority important-soon
/assign @neolit123 @fabriziopandini

[dims]

/sig cluster-lifecycle
/priority important-soon

[neolit123]

thanks @dims
/assign @rosti
/milestone v1.16

[bmwiedemann]

I tested this change (rebased on top of openSUSE's kubernetes-1.14.1) and the man page diffs went away.

[bmwiedemann]

The commit message and PR description should add some detail about why this change is good, e.g.:
make the man-page generation reproducible

[rosti]

Thanks @dims !
Just a minor nit, can you add a comment next to the sort call to indicate, that we need it for reproducible builds? Someone may accidentally delete it in the future.
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, rosti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• cmd/kubeadm/OWNERS [rosti]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[neolit123]

/lgtm
/hold

@dims @rosti it's OK without the comment, but it's better with it, i guess.

Thanks @dims !
Just a minor nit, can you add a comment next to the sort call to indicate, that we need it for reproducible builds? Someone may accidentally delete it in the future.

@rosti please unhold if see fit.

[rosti]

Let's not hold it off further, because of the comment.
/hold cancel