Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move initsystem to kubeadm #79032

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2019
Merged

Conversation

yastij
Copy link
Member

@yastij yastij commented Jun 14, 2019

Signed-off-by: Yassine TIJANI ytijani@vmware.com

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup
/priority important-soon

What this PR does / why we need it: ref kubernetes/kubeadm#1600

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

/cc @rosti
/assign @neolit123

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from rosti June 14, 2019 14:08
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. area/kubeadm sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 14, 2019
Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @yastij
i'm OK with the new location.

A) kubeadm is the only consumer
B) futher decouples kubeadm from /pkg

LGTM
/approve
/priority backlog
/kind cleanup
/assign @liggitt @timothysc
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Jun 14, 2019
@yastij
Copy link
Member Author

yastij commented Jun 14, 2019

/remove-priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Jun 14, 2019
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jun 14, 2019

/approve

thanks!

@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Jun 14, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@rosti rosti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @yastij !
Makes perfect sense to me as kubeadm is the only user of it.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 14, 2019
@yastij
Copy link
Member Author

yastij commented Jun 14, 2019

@rosti - fixed golint failures, some comments were missing, added them

@yagonobre
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 14, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, neolit123, yastij

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Jun 14, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 14, 2019
@yastij
Copy link
Member Author

yastij commented Jun 14, 2019

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 15, 2019
Signed-off-by: Yassine TIJANI <ytijani@vmware.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jun 17, 2019
Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 17, 2019
@yagonobre
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d3bbe03 into kubernetes:master Jun 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubeadm cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants