Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move population of expectedUIDs outside lock #79592

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2019
Merged

Move population of expectedUIDs outside lock #79592

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2019

Conversation

tedyu
Copy link
Contributor

@tedyu tedyu commented Jul 1, 2019 •
edited

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
For UIDTrackingControllerExpectations, in ExpectDeletions, acquire the lock before operation on u.uidStore

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 1, 2019
@tedyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tedyu commented Jul 1, 2019

cc @wojtek-t

@tedyu tedyu changed the title Optimize use of uidStoreLock for UIDTrackingControllerExpectations Move population of expectedUIDs outside lock Jul 1, 2019
@tedyu
Copy link
Contributor Author

tedyu commented Jul 1, 2019

@wojtek-t
Please take another look

@wojtek-t
Copy link
Member

wojtek-t commented Jul 1, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tedyu, wojtek-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f56b336 into kubernetes:master Jul 1, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wojtek-t wojtek-t wojtek-t left review comments

@cheftako cheftako Awaiting requested review from cheftako

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

Assignees

@wojtek-t wojtek-t

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@tedyu @wojtek-t @k8s-ci-robot