Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

volume-controller: fix static check failures #81680

Conversation

sadlil
Copy link
Contributor

@sadlil sadlil commented Aug 20, 2019

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR fixes static check failures for the following packages

pkg/controller/volume/persistentvolume/testing	
pkg/controller/volume/scheduling

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Ref #81657
Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sadlil. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 20, 2019
@sadlil sadlil changed the title controller:volume fix static check failures volume-controller: fix static check failures Aug 20, 2019
@sadlil
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadlil commented Aug 20, 2019

/assign @ixdy @msau42

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Aug 20, 2019

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 20, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta fejta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

the hack change

@sadlil sadlil force-pushed the sadlil/fix-static-check-volume-controller branch from 33f9a72 to 7a8eaf4 Compare August 21, 2019 07:38
@sadlil
Copy link
Contributor Author

sadlil commented Aug 21, 2019

/assign @msau42

I have changed the test to run on all the pvs.

@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Aug 21, 2019

/lgtm
/approve
/priority important-soon
Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. labels Aug 21, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 21, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta fejta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fejta, msau42, sadlil

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b8f4f27 into kubernetes:master Aug 23, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.16 milestone Aug 23, 2019
@sadlil sadlil deleted the sadlil/fix-static-check-volume-controller branch August 23, 2019 05:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants