New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
optimize gc_controller.gcTerminated #82356
Conversation
Hi @m3ngyang. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @foxish |
/assing @fedebongio |
/assign @liggitt |
if deleteCount > 0 { | ||
klog.Infof("garbage collecting %v pods", deleteCount) | ||
} else { | ||
klog.Infof("terminated pods number %d is under threshold %d", terminatedPodCount, gcc.terminatedPodThreshold) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
drop this, logging on no-op will spam the logs
I re-pushed the commit and fixed the mentioned problems. @liggitt |
/ok-to-test |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, m3ngyang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
optimize some codes in
gc_controller.gcTerminated
:gcTerminated
,gcc.terminatedPodThreshold
must be > 0,kubernetes/pkg/controller/podgc/gc_controller.go
Lines 93 to 95 in 84fe3db
so, the following
if
won't workkubernetes/pkg/controller/podgc/gc_controller.go
Lines 118 to 122 in 84fe3db
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: