Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify volume zone checker codes #84611

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 19, 2019

Conversation

cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line:

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:
currently, volume zone checker codes use too many if ... else, we'd better simplify it and improve the readability.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 31, 2019
@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

/sig scheduling

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 31, 2019
@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @k82cn

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Nov 4, 2019

/kind cleanup
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 4, 2019
@k82cn k82cn removed the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Nov 4, 2019
@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

@k82cn PTAL thanks

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

ping @alculquicondor @wgliang for review

Copy link
Contributor

@wgliang wgliang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@cwdsuzhou Thanks.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 15, 2019
name: "unbound volume empty storage class",
Pod: createPodWithVolume("pod_1", "vol_1", "PVC_EmptySC"),
Node: testNode,
wantStatus: framework.NewStatus(framework.Error,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this format seems wrong, please revert

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alculquicondor I have go fmt the codes, it is not wrong.

see line334 and 340 also have the similar format

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh I see, you put a new line

Copy link
Member

@alculquicondor alculquicondor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

ping @k82cn for approve

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @ravisantoshgudimetla

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

ping @ravisantoshgudimetla for approval

Copy link
Contributor

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the clean up @cwdsuzhou

/lgtm

@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

I think, this can wait till code freeze is lifted though :)

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

I think, this can wait till code freeze is lifted though :)

Thanks

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

ping @ahg-g @k82cn for approval

@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Thank you @cwdsuzhou

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cwdsuzhou, ravisantoshgudimetla

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 18, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

2 similar comments
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@cwdsuzhou
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9fad2e3 into kubernetes:master Dec 19, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.18 milestone Dec 19, 2019
@cwdsuzhou cwdsuzhou deleted the Nov/simplyfy_zone_checker branch December 20, 2019 02:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants