New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kubeadm: Amend the hyperkube deprecation change #85137
kubeadm: Amend the hyperkube deprecation change #85137
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rosti The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
/hold |
The PR introducing 5bb8069 got merged accidentally (the CI robot not respecting a hold). Hence, the feedback to that PR is merged separately. Signed-off-by: Rostislav M. Georgiev <rostislavg@vmware.com>
ee6dbab
to
ec4840f
Compare
Updated by marking the internal |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/retest |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/retest |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
As #85094 got merged accidentally (the CI robot not respecting a
/hold
) we need to amend it with the feedback separately.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Refs kubernetes/kubeadm#1889
Special notes for your reviewer:
/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
/area kubeadm
/priority important-soon
/assign @neolit123 @ereslibre @fabriziopandini
/cc @yastij
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: