Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gce-addons: Make sure default/limit-range doesn't get overridden #87902

Merged

Conversation

apelisse
Copy link
Member

@apelisse apelisse commented Feb 6, 2020

On cluster update, the limit-range in the default namespace gets overridden, which can cause problems for customers.

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 6, 2020
@apelisse
Copy link
Member Author

apelisse commented Feb 6, 2020

/assign @mikedanese

@apelisse
Copy link
Member Author

apelisse commented Feb 6, 2020

/cc @yliaog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. label Feb 6, 2020
@apelisse
Copy link
Member Author

apelisse commented Feb 6, 2020

/priority important-soon
/sig cloud-provider

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 6, 2020
@mikedanese
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: apelisse, mikedanese

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 6, 2020
@yliaog
Copy link
Contributor

yliaog commented Feb 6, 2020

/lgtm

@mikedanese do you know the reason to have this limitrange for default namespace?

@apelisse
Copy link
Member Author

apelisse commented Feb 6, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@apelisse
Copy link
Member Author

apelisse commented Feb 6, 2020

/retest

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ab97b66 into kubernetes:master Feb 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.18 milestone Feb 7, 2020
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
…02-upstream-release-1.15

Automated cherry pick of #87902: gce-addons: Make sure default/limit-range doesn't get
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
…02-upstream-release-1.17

Automated cherry pick of #87902: gce-addons: Make sure default/limit-range doesn't get
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
…02-upstream-release-1.16

Automated cherry pick of #87902: gce-addons: Make sure default/limit-range doesn't get
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants