Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NetworkPolicy e2e test should wait for Pod ready #88341

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2020

Conversation

tnqn
Copy link
Member

@tnqn tnqn commented Feb 19, 2020

What type of PR is this?
/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:
The test "should enforce egress policy allowing traffic to a server in a
different namespace based on PodSelector and NamespaceSelector
[Feature:NetworkPolicy]" is flaky because it doesn't wait for the server
Pod to be ready before testing traffic via its service, then even the
NetworkPolicy allows it, the SYN packets will be rejected by iptables
because the service has no endpoints at that moment.

This PR fixes it by making it wait for Pods to be ready like other
tests.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #88340

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


The test "should enforce egress policy allowing traffic to a server in a
different namespace based on PodSelector and NamespaceSelector
[Feature:NetworkPolicy]" is flaky because it doesn't wait for the server
Pod to be ready before testing traffic via its service, then even the
NetworkPolicy allows it, the SYN packets will be rejected by iptables
because the service has no endpoints at that moment.

This PR fixes it by making it wait for Pods to be ready like other
tests.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 19, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tnqn. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 19, 2020
@tnqn tnqn requested review from matthyx, bowei and andrewsykim and removed request for thockin and johnbelamaric February 19, 2020 16:52
@tnqn
Copy link
Member Author

tnqn commented Feb 19, 2020

cc: @lzang (not able to add you to reviewers)

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test
/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 19, 2020
@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/assign

@johnbelamaric
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 19, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: johnbelamaric, tnqn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 19, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 96dfa3f into kubernetes:master Feb 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.18 milestone Feb 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
3 participants