New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Capture conformance Behaviors in walk.go #88770
Capture conformance Behaviors in walk.go #88770
Conversation
e3995c2
to
4ebf9a5
Compare
4ebf9a5
to
f2a8d98
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/cc @oomichi
f2a8d98
to
794f04a
Compare
794f04a
to
6da6380
Compare
/lgtm |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing the issue.
/lgtm
@@ -42,9 +42,8 @@ | |||
codename: '[k8s.io] Container Runtime blackbox test on terminated container should | |||
report termination message [LinuxOnly] as empty when pod succeeds and TerminationMessagePolicy | |||
FallbackToLogsOnError is set [NodeConformance] [Conformance]' | |||
description: 'Name: Container Runtime, TerminationMessage, from log output of succeeding |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change seems fine according to the corresponding e2e test code as
kubernetes/test/e2e/common/runtime.go
Line 249 in f52cbea
Name: Container Runtime, TerminationMessage, from file of succeeding container |
The old description contained
Name:
part also, then the description seemed odd. New one seems correct.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I submitted a follow up PR for this #88923.
Some conformance headers had "Name" instead of "Testname" and were picked up as part of the description by the tooling.
/approve |
1 similar comment
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Jefftree, johnbelamaric, oomichi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Capture conformance behaviors if they are defined in the comments section of a test. I will add the behaviors <-> tests linkage in a follow up PR
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
The
conformance.yaml
change fixes #88918. We were logging comments not part of the Description in the Description section.Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:
/assign @johnbelamaric
/priority important-soon