Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix golint errors in staging/src/k8s.io/client-go/plugin/pkg/client/a… #88940

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2020

Conversation

tianhongw
Copy link

@tianhongw tianhongw commented Mar 7, 2020

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

fix golint errors in staging/src/k8s.io/client-go/plugin/pkg/client/auth/oidc

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

XREF #68026

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @tianhongw!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tianhongw. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 7, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@gavinfish gavinfish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General lgtm, but please do not use Fixes #issue in the description which will close it. You can use something like xref.

@tianhongw
Copy link
Author

I signed it

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 7, 2020
@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Mar 7, 2020

/retest

@tianhongw
Copy link
Author

General lgtm, but please do not use Fixes #issue in the description which will close it. You can use something like xref.

Thanks for your suggestion!

@gavinfish
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 7, 2020
@tianhongw
Copy link
Author

/assign @cblecker @ericchiang

@mikedanese
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 8, 2020
@mikedanese mikedanese added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Mar 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Mar 8, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

/assign

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@tianhongw tianhongw changed the base branch from master to release-1.18 March 12, 2020 03:05
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Mar 12, 2020
@tianhongw
Copy link
Author

tianhongw commented Mar 12, 2020

@leksandra-malinowska

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

whoa, this is for a release branch?

/lgtm cancel
/approve cancel

Please send this to master.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 12, 2020
@lavalamp lavalamp removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 12, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mikedanese, tianhongw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 12, 2020
@tianhongw tianhongw changed the base branch from release-1.18 to master March 12, 2020 22:12
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Mar 12, 2020
@tianhongw
Copy link
Author

@lavalamp Sorry for that>.< I thought i should cherry pick it to 1.18 branch because of i notice this description in check:

Not mergeable. Must be in milestone v1.18.

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member

lavalamp commented Mar 13, 2020 via email

@ash2k
Copy link
Member

ash2k commented Apr 10, 2020

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2020
@tianhongw
Copy link
Author

/retest

@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5bfe8fe into kubernetes:master Apr 10, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Apr 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants