Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update code comment for NetworkPolicyPeer #89018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 20, 2020

Conversation

abhiraut
Copy link
Contributor

NetworkPolicyPeer in types has an outdated comment from the times when it only supported
ingress rules. Update the comment to reflect the current usage of the field.

/kind cleanup

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 10, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @abhiraut. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 10, 2020
@abhiraut
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig network

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 10, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Mar 10, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

This PR may require API review.

If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review.

Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project.

Copy link

@cmluciano cmluciano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

@abhiraut
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR may require API review.

If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review.

Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project.

@dcbw probably does not require an API review?

@thockin thockin added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 17, 2020
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Mar 17, 2020

This is going to fail CI - it needs files regenerated. That said, it's a trivial change so:

/approve

Once you generate files and re-push, we can lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2020
NetworkPolicyPeer in types has an outdated comment from the
times when it only supported ingress rules. Update the comment
to reflect the current usage of the field.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/kubectl sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. labels Mar 18, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhiraut, thockin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@abhiraut
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 19, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 3d46b78 into kubernetes:master Mar 20, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Mar 20, 2020
@abhiraut abhiraut deleted the npTypes branch March 20, 2020 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubectl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants