New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
e2e/framework: security/ and /service remove direct import /k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/ #89198
Conversation
@tanjunchen: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cc @alejandrox1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for doing this!
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: SataQiu, tanjunchen The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minor comments to add TODO, lgtm otherwise :)
profileNameUnconfined = "unconfined" | ||
|
||
// The prefix to an annotation key specifying a container profile. | ||
containerAnnotationKeyPrefix = "container.apparmor.security.beta.kubernetes.io/" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a TODO comment to import this from the k8s.io/api
once it's moved there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ref #89225
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a TODO comment to import this from the
k8s.io/api
once it's moved there
sure Thanks you review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ref #89225
updated.
@andrewsykim I will follow this pr 89225
@@ -37,6 +36,12 @@ const ( | |||
|
|||
loaderLabelKey = "name" | |||
loaderLabelValue = "e2e-apparmor-loader" | |||
|
|||
// Unconfined profile | |||
profileNameUnconfined = "unconfined" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
/retest |
/test pull-kubernetes-integration |
The change itself seems good for me, please rebase this for the latest master. |
done |
/lgtm |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind |
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
ref:#74352
Special notes for your reviewer:
e2e/framework: security/ and /service remove direct import /k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: