Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix runtime admission flaky test due to race condition #91315

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 22, 2020

Conversation

jesusha123
Copy link
Contributor

@jesusha123 jesusha123 commented May 21, 2020

What type of PR is this?

/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:

This change fixes a problem in the RuntimeClass admission plugin rejecting pods with a RuntimeClass not found message caused by a race condition.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #90653

Special notes for your reviewer:

RuntimeClass admission plugin uses a cache to determine if a pod should be admitted. This cache is updated when a RuntimeClass is created in an informer thread.

The cache updating thread runs in a different thread than the admission validation. If a RuntimeClass is created, and a pod with a RuntimeClass spec is immediately created afterwards, there's a window of time where the cache hasn't been updated yet, so the plugin just throws a RuntimeClass not found message and error out.

With this change, if the cache lookup fails, we do a live lookup instead of waiting for the cache to be updated.

Unit tests were added that cover the exported methods ValidationInitialization and Admit, which are used in the modified code.

I was also able to reproduce this problem consistently by adding a delay in the informer updating thread, in method sharedIndexInformer.HandleDeltas, and confirmed this change fixes the reported problem.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

/cc @liggitt

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from liggitt May 21, 2020 00:57
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 21, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jherrera123. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented May 21, 2020

/sig node
/priority important-soon
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels May 21, 2020
@jesusha123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented May 21, 2020

@jesusha123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented May 22, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 22, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jherrera123, liggitt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 22, 2020
@jesusha123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9f5d9a9 into kubernetes:master May 22, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone May 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/flake Categorizes issue or PR as related to a flaky test. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

flake: [sig-node] RuntimeClass should reject a Pod requesting a RuntimeClass with an unconfigured handler
3 participants