New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automated cherry pick of #92584: kube-proxy ipvs masquerade hairpin traffic #92748
Automated cherry pick of #92584: kube-proxy ipvs masquerade hairpin traffic #92748
Conversation
Masquerade de traffic that loops back to the originator before they hit the kubernetes-specific postrouting rules Signed-off-by: Antonio Ojea <antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com>
/assing @andrewsykim |
only the flexvolume tests failed in the ipvs job seems is good to go |
/hold |
@andrewsykim this job is only failing the 2 flexvolumes tests, so it should be ok, but I don't think we should move forward with this until 1.17 is working /retest |
We should use 'nf_conntrack' instead of 'nf_conntrack_ipv4' for linux kernel >= 4.19
/hold cancel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
/assign @spiffxp Can you sign off on the /cluster changes here? |
Just noting for myself or whomever is spelunking, though it's not clear from the title or description, #89327 got cherry picked into this |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andrewsykim, aojea, spiffxp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
3 similar comments
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/kind bug |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@aojea seeing actual test failures here |
For the session affinity tests I think you also need to backport #89854 😕 |
/hold |
/retest |
nevermind, I've added the the affinity tests checking the timeout for stickiness in a later version 😄 , only the flexvolume tests are failing /hold cancel |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
@aojea: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
Cherry pick of #92584 on release-1.16.
#92584: kube-proxy ipvs masquerade hairpin traffic
For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.