Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency #97794

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 14, 2021

Conversation

chendave
Copy link
Member

@chendave chendave commented Jan 7, 2021

Signed-off-by: Dave Chen dave.chen@arm.com

@ahg-g @lixiang233 I came across this line of code today, and I do think this line of code is a legacy nit, the status code has been set in the below snippet of code, but in the loop it was set for each plugin, consider the case that status map hold the status for each of plugin, this kind of instruction is not effective and unnecessary.

if finalStatus.err != nil {
finalStatus.code = Error
} else if hasUnschedulableAndUnresolvable {
finalStatus.code = UnschedulableAndUnresolvable
} else if hasUnschedulable {
finalStatus.code = Unschedulable
}

For the sake of other status code might be added in the future, we can tweak the code a little bit.

@ahg-g what do you think?

What type of PR is this?

Add one of the following kinds:
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chendave: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 7, 2021
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

I don't think this PR is increasing readability.

However, I do think this function is hard to read. I would reconsider if you can come up with an alternate rewrite of the function that is more readable.

@ahg-g
Copy link
Member

ahg-g commented Jan 7, 2021

right, this doesn't move the readability needle.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 8, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Jan 8, 2021

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 8, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 8, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Jan 8, 2021

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 8, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

chendave commented Jan 8, 2021

@alculquicondor How about this version?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 11, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@alculquicondor alculquicondor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't forget to update title and description

pkg/scheduler/framework/interface.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chendave chendave force-pushed the cleanup_status branch 2 times, most recently from 1e29006 to 71c1179 Compare January 12, 2021 08:46
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

/retitle "Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency"

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Set the status code only where is needed "Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency" Jan 12, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

/retitle Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title "Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency" Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency Jan 12, 2021
@chendave chendave changed the title Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency Refactor: rewrite Merge method to address readability and efficiency Jan 12, 2021
@chendave
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@alculquicondor alculquicondor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

pkg/scheduler/framework/interface.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, chendave

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 13, 2021
Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <dave.chen@arm.com>
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit faaae71 into kubernetes:master Jan 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Jan 14, 2021
@chendave chendave deleted the cleanup_status branch January 15, 2021 02:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants