Fix a bug that untolerated variable is used as tolerated

[Huang-Wei]

What type of PR is this?

/kind regression
/sig scheduling
/priority critical-urgent

What this PR does / why we need it:

#98445 introduced a regression that failed all scheduler performance (integration) tests:

F0202 23:48:44.559482 3887158 perf_utils.go:104] Error listing nodes: there are currently no ready, schedulable nodes in the cluster
goroutine 92 [running]:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2.stacks(0xc000a7b001, 0xc004d62000, 0x85, 0x14d)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:1026 +0xb9
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).output(0x71fffc0, 0xc000000003, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc001c7a7e0, 0x70b6404, 0xd, 0x68, 0x0)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:975 +0x19b
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2.(*loggingT).printf(0x71fffc0, 0xc000000003, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x48e4cbb, 0x17, 0xc0077c3770, 0x1, ...)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:750 +0x191
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2.Fatalf(...)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/klog/v2/klog.go:1514
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework.(*IntegrationTestNodePreparer).PrepareNodes(0xc005f56940, 0x0, 0xc005f0d770, 0x5172660)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/framework/perf_utils.go:104 +0xa26
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/scheduler_perf.runWorkload(0xc0000f5680, 0xc000112b40, 0xc000200d00, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/scheduler_perf/scheduler_perf_test.go:337 +0x121d
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/scheduler_perf.BenchmarkPerfScheduling.func1.1(0xc0000f5680)
        /root/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/scheduler_perf/scheduler_perf_test.go:299 +0x16a
testing.(*B).runN(0xc0000f5680, 0x1)
        /usr/local/go/src/testing/benchmark.go:191 +0xeb
testing.(*B).run1.func1(0xc0000f5680)
        /usr/local/go/src/testing/benchmark.go:231 +0x57
created by testing.(*B).run1
        /usr/local/go/src/testing/benchmark.go:224 +0x7f

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[Huang-Wei]

/cc @damemi @alculquicondor

(scheduler maintainers don't have approving privileges, so)
/assign @oomichi
for kindly review.

[neolit123]

SGTM

/lgtm
/approve
/triage accepted

/hold
unhold when needed.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Huang-Wei, neolit123

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• test/OWNERS [neolit123]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Huang-Wei]

/retest

[Huang-Wei]

Thanks @neolit123 .

/unassign @oomichi
/hold cancel

[damemi]

Sorry I missed this one, but thanks for catching and fixing it @Huang-Wei