Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deal with blank nodes #42

Closed
simongray opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Deal with blank nodes #42

simongray opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request nice-to-have UI

Comments

@simongray
Copy link
Member

Some inspiration here: https://www.reddit.com/r/semanticweb/comments/qke4gu/til_how_to_roundtrip_blank_nodes_in_jenafuseki/

Some RDF nodes are blank—i.e. they don't have a stable ID—and dealing with them can be troublesome. It may be possible to find a generic way to "expand" blank node content and include it with RDF resource lookups.
@simongray simongray added enhancement New feature or request nice-to-have labels May 13, 2022
@simongray simongray added the UI label Aug 17, 2022
@simongray
Copy link
Member Author

I think this makes little sense to pursue right now, as all of the DanNet data currently has fixed IDs and no blank nodes. It used to be the case that examples and usage notes are attached to blank entities, but this has been changed. Of course, third party and inferred data can still feature blank nodes so it makes sense to retain the current support for blank nodes—it just needn't be expanded upon right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request nice-to-have UI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@simongray