New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

击键、码长统计数据可能有误 #5

Closed

doloopo opened this issue Jul 19, 2020 · 1 comment

doloopo commented Jul 19, 2020

两幅图中为本人所打的同一文段，且打字速度数据相近（127 字/分）。

添雨跟打器中测得的码长为 3.91，击键为 8.28；但在玫枫跟打器中测得的码长达到了 6.91，击键居然为惊人的 14.70，而本人在试验多种跟打器后也测出本人的击键不可能超过 10，即便有回退码长也不会达到 6.91，因此我认为玫枫跟打器的击键及码长的计算统计结果有误。

玫枫跟打器是很优秀的跟打器，谢谢你的付出！如果能修复我在上面提出的问题，相信此跟打器会变得更好！

Owner

KyleBing commented Jul 21, 2020

嗯，那可能是里面算错了，我回头看看吧。暂时先只把速度作为参考吧。

KyleBing closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment