Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate usuing ExtensionlessURLs #152

Open
astappiev opened this issue Apr 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Evaluate usuing ExtensionlessURLs #152

astappiev opened this issue Apr 11, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
low priority You should work on it only in case if no other issues
Milestone

Comments

@astappiev
Copy link
Member

http://showcase.omnifaces.org/facesviews/ExtensionlessURLs

Pros:

  • no .jsf in URLs, no one using file extensions now
  • we can create URLs like /group/1160/resources instead of /lw/group/resources.jsf?group_id=1160

Cons:

  • Definitely some slowdown, now sure if noticeable
  • Migration, we need somehow to manage backward compatibility
@astappiev
Copy link
Member Author

For a simple performance test of a single page, we can use https://www.primefaces.org/showcase/ui/misc/lifecycle.xhtml

For a more complex test, we need to use https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/get-started.html

@astappiev
Copy link
Member Author

In GitLab by @PhilippKemkes on Apr 11, 2020, 20:11

We can check. But it's not important for Milestone 3.0

@astappiev
Copy link
Member Author

Changing URLs is a big change. And I agree, we can't do that until the end of this month.

Maybe we need to start thinking about Learnweb 4.0. For example, JSF 3.0 can be a reason, it should be released later this year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
low priority You should work on it only in case if no other issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant