Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add type definitions #11

Closed
sweepies opened this issue Apr 14, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Add type definitions #11

sweepies opened this issue Apr 14, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@sweepies
Copy link

Would love to use this in my TS project.

@niftylettuce
Copy link
Collaborator

I do not support TypeScript, it is not open-source friendly for the JavaScript community nor GitHub.

@vkarpov15
Copy link

@niftylettuce I'd love to hear your reasons why. Not criticizing or disagreeing, just want to hear your reasons for academic curiosity

@niftylettuce
Copy link
Collaborator

IMO TypeScript is horrible and the community doesn't need yet another CoffeeScript, the main reason being the latter.

@sweepies
Copy link
Author

sweepies commented Apr 19, 2019

Sorry, no.

TypeScript is a completely separate project that brings only objective benefits over JavaScript, and is growing rapidly. Pure JavaScript development has already been deprecated by a lot of people.

You can choose to not maintain your project out of laziness, but that excuse is simply not valid. Is there an actual reason you think it's not good for open source?

@vkarpov15
Copy link

@sweepyoface this isn't my project so I can't speak for @niftylettuce , but your tone is not appropriate for a constructive discussion. This is a JavaScript project, the maintainers have zero obligation to support typescript. And for every typescript purist, theres plenty of people that think TS is bloated and not worth the effort.

Here's a thought: would you or your company consider paying for TS bindings?

@ladjs ladjs locked as off-topic and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 19, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants