Add reference to OCSP?

[csosto-pk]

From https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/mHLRo-X8U7ZAF5BRjPEPA8lHQtk/

Should this document also talk about Dilithium signatures in OCSP? I realize that was not done when RFC 3279 and RFC 5480 were written.
Russ

[csosto-pk]

Hmm, we did not do that RFC8692 recently either.
But all these identifiers could be used in the SigAlgID in OCSP request/responses or staples as well.
Probably it makes sense we reference OCSP in the draft.

[csosto-pk]

From Tim H.

I have a slight preference for keeping them separate. When OCSP and CRLs are discussed in the same document, it's often confusing because they're quite different, and it's difficult to keep clear what applies to one or the other, and what applies to both.