You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In light of recent changes can constraint_complex_voltage_ne{T <: AbstractWRForm} be made cleaner? Like constraint_complex_voltage_on_off{T <: AbstractWRForm}?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see the issue. The functions used in constraint_complex_voltage_on_off, implicitly call the standard versions of the variables, while constraint_complex_voltage_ne needs the "_ne" versions. Will think about how to unify these.
And we can't directly use the "standard" versions of the variables, because that would preclude us from creating a model with both line switching and expansion planning.
In light of recent changes can
constraint_complex_voltage_ne{T <: AbstractWRForm}
be made cleaner? Likeconstraint_complex_voltage_on_off{T <: AbstractWRForm}
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: